![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
I don't know what's sadder...
May. 21st, 2010 10:16 pmThe fact that this woman is suing, or that she has a case because Rogers shouldn't have combined their bills without consent...
A Toronto mother who says her marriage fell apart because her Rogers cellphone bill exposed her extramarital affair is suing Canada's largest cellphone services provider...
..."As a consequence of her husband's said departure, the plaintiff wept uncontrollably at her workplace, did so in the presence of other employees, distracted them, was unfocused and became incapable of performing her employment duties," the statement of claim reads.
"The plaintiff continued to attempt to resume normal job functioning but was unsuccessful, and on Oct. 10, 2007, she was terminated."
Nagy's bill was being sent in her name until her husband signed up for Rogers Internet and home phone. Those services, along with Nagy's cellphone, were bundled into one bill and that new invoice was addressed to her husband, the suit alleges.
"The said invoice mailed to the husband contained details of her outgoing cellular calls," the suit, filed in January 2009, reads.
"The husband thereby had access for the first time to the confidential and private information of the cellular calls made by the plaintiff."...
She might win this one because they combined the bills without permission. She shouldn't, because she's the one who had the affair but she might. People won't take responsibility for their actions, and the courts are telling them that they don't have to. Great recipe for the future...
A Toronto mother who says her marriage fell apart because her Rogers cellphone bill exposed her extramarital affair is suing Canada's largest cellphone services provider...
..."As a consequence of her husband's said departure, the plaintiff wept uncontrollably at her workplace, did so in the presence of other employees, distracted them, was unfocused and became incapable of performing her employment duties," the statement of claim reads.
"The plaintiff continued to attempt to resume normal job functioning but was unsuccessful, and on Oct. 10, 2007, she was terminated."
Nagy's bill was being sent in her name until her husband signed up for Rogers Internet and home phone. Those services, along with Nagy's cellphone, were bundled into one bill and that new invoice was addressed to her husband, the suit alleges.
"The said invoice mailed to the husband contained details of her outgoing cellular calls," the suit, filed in January 2009, reads.
"The husband thereby had access for the first time to the confidential and private information of the cellular calls made by the plaintiff."...
She might win this one because they combined the bills without permission. She shouldn't, because she's the one who had the affair but she might. People won't take responsibility for their actions, and the courts are telling them that they don't have to. Great recipe for the future...
